Fall 2004

  • Phys Comp

Fall 2005

  • Advanced Tech
  • The Creative Act
  • Video for New Media

Spring 2005

  • Conceptual Design
  • Networked Objects
  • Video Art

Spring 2006

  • User Centered Design

Post-ITP

Links

  • robseward.com
  • Generative Theory Of Tonal Music Software

Recent Entries

  • Slowly
  • More
  • Light studies continued
  • Continued
  • Library Light Study Continued
  • Library light study
  • Final Project
  • Kitchen Inventory System User Scenario
  • 10 (approx.) Ideas
  • Kitchen Observations 1-5

Archives

  • February 2007
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • May 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004

« Logo Sketches | Main | Reading Response 2 »

February 01, 2005

Reading notes

Virtually Living Together

This is a mostly theoretical paper. It sets out to illustrate the author’s design process which can be loosely summed up as Observation-Invention. They perform “rapid ethnographic studies”; that is, they interview and observe potential users. Next, they create characters and brainstorm scenarios (around 40) to discover places where technology could be useful. Then they move into a prototype/evaluation phase.

Given the examples of projects that came out of this project, I’m not convinced that the design process advocated here is better than the vision/intuition model that the authors frequently deride. I thought the devices in the other paper where more interesting and their creative process did not seem so involved.




Using Digital but Physical Surrogates to Mediate Awareness, Communication, and Privacy in Media Spaces.

The paper starts off explaining that devices that indicate the availability of coworkers should be indicated only in the periphery of the users awareness. Also, the indicator should not be running on the computer--it could be obstructed by another open window and also some people do not work on the computer. I thought the devices were clever, better than those in the other paper. I especially liked the doll that faced the wall when a coworker was not in the office and faced the room when he was present. Also, the video-conferencing device seemed like it could actually be quite useful, a good way to mix privacy with communication.

Posted by rus200 at February 1, 2005 02:50 PM